![]() It traces how the data is transferred internally in your application and it follows all the jumps between systems. With this diagram, you can follow the data through the entire system. All jumps, fan outs, webhooks, etc are documented so you can easily identify points of failure. It traces the data flow of the major business processes from system to system. ![]() The critical path diagram is meant to be a map of your entire ecosystem. None of the diagrams I spoke about in my other article cover that scenario. Something that generalized the architecture, but was also specific enough to give me enough detail to know where the break points are in my application. I needed a diagram that shows critical paths through the system so I could prepare a realistic disaster scenario. The other day, I was prepping for a tabletop exercise for an application getting ready to go live and I was reading through my list of architecture diagrams. ![]() There are nuanced differences and both help drive important information about your app in different ways. ![]() They loosely adapt to the c4 model for diagramming software architecture. It walks you through how and why you should create diagrams like the flow, service, persona, infrastructure, and developer diagrams. They help create a shared understanding about application architecture, business processes, and data flows between you and the stakeholders of your app.Īround a year ago, I wrote a post about the 5 types of architecture diagrams which described many of the diagrams we use today. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |